THE MANUAL GROUP
The members of the former Manual Group are again exhibiting their works together. Although some new pieces are also on display at the show, their collective presence is primarily reminiscent. Furthermore, it signifies a joint commemoration of the late Anna Szilasi, who died in 2003. The Manual Group was founded in 1975 by six artists representing different styles and characters. However, they discovered a specific attitude that was similar in the works of each of them. The Manual Group represented a possible alternative to the trend that in general can be described as one following and advancing modernism. The puritan functionalism of this trend revised and surpassed the several hundred year old traditions of artistic object creation in order to enforce the aspects of optimal usage and practicality. The members of the Manual Group distanced themselves from the tendencies of autonomous object creation, too. They turned back to the traditions that the engineering designer ideology of the time regarded as outworn. They accepted and undertook both the decorativeness and the uniqueness of works created with handicraft techniques. The critics first described the group as nostalgic, whereas a couple of decades later they saw the forerunner of post-modernism in the approach. Fortunately it was possible to learn about the principles of the group not only indirectly, through the interpretation of art historians, but also directly from the artists themselves. One could get to know their ideas as early as 1979, at their first Hungarian exhibition in the Art Hall. The Manual Group artists published what they considered the most important in their works, probably so that they could avoid any possible misunderstanding or misinterpretation. The ars poetica of the artists highlights the artworks message: the objects of the Manual Group represent, in the original and complete sense of the phrase, arts and crafts. They are opposed to objects based on fine arts as much as to products created though engineering design. In Hungarian language the term iparművészet, that is arts and crafts, can be misleading. The expression lost its value when it was linked to the false-art of fair goods which the Manual Group thoroughly rejects. Nevertheless, the exploited and discredited term should not lose its original, historical meaning. The art of the Manual Group can take us closer to the restoration of the term which is so rich in shades of meanings. Unfortunately this restoration is still a long way ahead as it would require a basic knowledge of object culture on the part of the audience. However, neither in the 1970s nor later did such a discipline receive sufficient attention in public education compared to literature, music or fine arts. Those artists who committed themselves to art and crafts have always had to put up with the fact that the public approach their works either with the attitude of the audience of fine arts or that of the design consumers. The members of the Manual Group discovered this phenomenon in the mid 1970s and thus wrote their essays for the exhibition in 1979 to help the visitors understand the works. The critics of the time and the historians of later decades appreciated the written ars poetica of the artists as much as the visitors of the exhibitions or those interested in these artists and their works. It is astonishing to see that the analyses of the situation of 1983 is still adequate in 2007. The artists bad mood, their isolation caused by the superficial and business oriented artistic era, the public indifference and even antagonistic approach towards their values are all actual. We know how much has changed over the past two decades, but the basic problem can still be expressed with the very same words. Reading the sentences written in 1983 one can draw the conclusion that if the bad mood of the artists deepened as much as the circumstances stimulating that were escalating, then sooner or later it was inevitable that a radical change would occur in the group. The Manual ceased to exist, that is its members – regardless the positive feedback from their audience - did no longer exhibit as one group. They continued their artistic career independently on separate ways. They still shared the same ideology and attitude that united them earlier, but they did not feel the collective appearance justified. The cooperation of these enthusiastic young artists, who started their career at the same time and who shared similar aesthetic values, broke up; nevertheless their oeuvres evolving independently have ever since been growing. They have had one man shows, individual publications, their views and convictions on professional matters have appeared in articles and interviews. They are role models for many young artists, and the members involved in education could and still can pass on their ideas to those art students who are open and responsive to the still up-to-date ideology that can be defined as the Manual heritage. The people of the millennium live surrounded by virtual worlds. In this environment time will soon be ripen for the community to turn their attention and sensitivity to real and concrete objects which are formed by human hands. Not only because such creation itself possesses values, but rather due to the ideas their creator wishes to communicate. Those able to see and understand the distinctive character and even personality of unique and substantial artworks can appreciate the new exhibition of the former Manual members in 2007. The joint display is a symbolic gesture: after more than two decades, beyond isolation and bad mood, uniting possibly at the verge of wise separation, could the artists agree on a new collective exhibition which is much approved of both by the keen audience of the past, band also by the new generations who grew up without Manual exhibitions.
Text by: Ágnes Prékopa
Layout: Kálmán Molnár
Content: 76 + 4 pages, with 66 colour-plates
No. of Issues: 1000
Date of Publication: 2005
...One’s identity and its function is thus a question people may ask themselves, and this theme has engaged Fabricius since the start of her career. One striking tendency of her approach can be seen in her group photos, in which either the artist arranges her acquaintances among themselves, or she directs members of specific, existing groups to strike poses in staged, tableau-like scenes. However, a different approach to the subject also appears in Fabricius’s work again and again, focusing on the individual ... >>>
You can never see elements of nature in Ádám Magyar`s images, people in his photos are always depicted in strictly artificial surroundings. What is more, the environment is not simply "not natural" but people seem to exist in an expressively constructed, artificial, sometimes even surrealistic world. This is a world with hardly any grips and reference points, at most vague indications of and subtle hints at the >>>
Day by day we feel the need to surround ourselves in our visually important living spaces with landscapes – be they real or artificial. We have a desire to summon nature – in both its narrower and wider interpretation – to see it represented in our urban environment. >>>
Ákos Matzon is an eccentric. At first sight, neither his person, nor his works would seem to suggest that. He makes the impression of a jovial citizen rather than a Bohemian painter; his art affects us with its calculated orderliness rather than extravagant or astonishing quality. >>>
György Jovián considers himself an artist outside of trends, but his unwavering faith in painting nevertheless occasionally places him with the discourse on trends, which kindles the constant renewal of painting. >>>
László László Révész: I also lived in Etruria
And the book launche of the third issue of the museum-pedagogy series Colouring book – not only for kids drawn by the artist At 6 pm, Tuesday, 31 May 2011 in Bartók Béla road 25.
Faur Zsófi – Ráday Gallery welcomes you on VIENNAFAIR on stand nr. A0708 from 12 May to 15 May 2011. As an ephasized program of VIENNAFAIR on 13 May at 5pm on the stand of the Gallery Christian Zillner’s Beyond Modern and Postmodern- The Work of Hungarian Artist László László Révész, published by Faur Zsófi – Ráday Gallery and Publisher is being launched. . . >>>
.. But I would like to return to Moyra’s above mentioned sentence. My answer to it is as follows: I create images, sometimes I accompany them with words, but and I want them to grow out of thoughts. ...
.. The compositions of Gerhes and the other two Hungarian artists have finally taken their place among those of Andy Warhol, Robert Mapplethorpe, Cindy Sherman, Barbara Kruger, Tacita Dean, Ilya Kabakov, Joseph Beuys, Matthew Barney, Seydou Keita, Olafur Eliasson, Robert Rauschenberg and others. ...
.. Anna keeps posing the same question: to what extent can the individualised human coexist with the contradictory and fragmented nature of their identity, and what might belonging to a group mean to them ... >>>
.. Moreover, I think that Gábor Lajta’s neo-figurative painting is one of the most genuine, self-consistent, pondered and painted oeuvre in the contemporary Hungarian artistic scene. He keenly reflects not only on the present, past and future of art, but on national and international realty, too.
.. Several founders of Kineticism, László Moholy-Nagy, Viktor Vasarely, Nicolas Schöffer and György Kepes were Hungarians who worked abroad in Germany, France, or the USA. In Hungary, however, Kinetic Art as well .. >>>
As an artist of outstanding importance, László Hegedûs 2 has been on the Hungarian contemporary scene for about thirty years. Using different artistic means, his works, as those of a practitioner of a varied scale of technical media (photography, film, painting, prints and installation), have made a crucial contribution to the renewal of intermediary means and methods. >>>